Table of Contents

Click any of the following links to go straight to that section

1.	Extracts From Complete Transcript and Rebuttal		1
	1.1	Misrepresentation of Carl Wunsch’s Views	1
		Comment 54: Use of selective editing to misrepresent what Wunsch said about the ocean reservoir	1
		Comment 94: Use of selective editing to misrepresent what Wunsch said about modelling	2
	1.2	Failure to Inform Carl Wunsch of the Nature and Purpose of the Programme	3
		Comment 53: Failure to inform Wunsch about the nature of the programme	3
	1.3	Misrepresentation of Eigil Friis-Christensen’s Views	4
		Comment 60: Sunspot activity since 1540	4
	1.4	Misrepresentation of Sir David King’s Views	7
		Comment 137: Misquoting and distortion of David King’s ‘Antarctica’ comment	7
	1.5	Making Serious, Unsubstantiated Allegations Regarding the IPCC Without a Right of Reply	8
	1.5.1	Allegations that the Conclusions of the IPCC are “Politically Driven”	8
		Comment 2: Reiter’s credentials, links to lobby groups	8
		Comment 17: Accusation that IPCC’s conclusions are politically driven	9
		Comment 18: Stott’s credentials	10
		Comment 19: Composition of IPCC	10
		Comment 20: Pretence that government scientists and IPCC’s reviewers are not scientists	10
		Comment 22: Inaccurate claim about IPCC author lists	10
		Comment 23: False claim that evidence-based scientific agreement equals propaganda	10
		Comment 25: Narrator’s opinion regarding ‘distortion of science’ expressed as fact	11
	1.5.2	Allegations Regarding the IPCC’s First Assessment Report	12
		Comment 73: Claim that IPCC First Assessment ‘predicted climatic disaster’	12
		Comment 74: Implication that IPCC First Assessment ‘disregarded the role of the sun’	12