Extracts from Ofcom Complaint, by Category: Misrepresentation of Peoples Views

1. Extracts From Complete Transcript and Rebuttal

Page 29

_____________________________________________________________________

1.8

Misrepresentation of the Views of Environmental NGOs and of Ordinary People who are Concerned About the Environment

[Because no individuals or organisations were specifically named in this section of the film, it was considered by the Standards Division of Ofcom, and not by the Fairness Division.]

[Narrator]

But the new emphasis on man-made carbon dioxide as a possible environmental problem didnt just appeal to Mrs. Thatcher.

[Nigel Calder]

It was certainly something very favourable to the environmental idea – what I call the medieval environmentalism of: lets get back to the way things were in medieval times and get rid of all these dreadful cars and machines. They loved it because carbon dioxide was for them an emblem of industrialisation.

[Comment 75; The narrative, using an accumulation of interviewee and narrator statements (see Comment 80, page 30; Comment 81, page 30; Comment 120, page 31; and Comment 136, page 33), is presenting a wholly inaccurate picture of the environmental movement and its history, for which absolutely no evidence is provided. In fact no major environmental organisation advocates getting rid of cars. Greenpeace, for example, in its brochure How to save the climate (http://tinyurl.com/2qt7p9, PDF) (page 29) states:

The most important question when you buy your next car is: What is its fuel consumption?

Furthermore the programme gives a highly distorted and inaccurate impression by failing to mention the long history of environmental movements before the fall of the Berlin wall and the rise of anti-globalisation movements in the 1980s. For example, WWF has been campaigning since 1961 (see http://tinyurl.com/ywpfts); Greenpeace since 1971 (see http://tinyurl.com/2mn9jn); and Friends of the Earth since 1971 (see http://tinyurl.com/27eyrf).

This is therefore an apparent attempt by the film maker and by several of the interviewees to mislead the public about the views of environmental groups. Misrepresenting their views in this way is not only inaccurate but is also manipulative and slanderous, although as no individuals were named, it is unlikely to be actionable.]

(In breach of the 2003 Communications Act Section 265, Ofcom 5.4, 5.5, 5.7, 5.11, 5.12, 7.2, 7.3, 7.6, 7.9)

[Cut to film clip of people destroying the Berlin Wall]

[Patrick Moore]

The other reason that environmental extremism emerged was because world communism failed: the wall came down, and a lot of peaceniks and political activists moved into the environmental movement, bringing their neo-Marxism with them; and learnt to use green language in a very clever way to cloak agendas that actually have more to do with anti-capitalism and anti-globalisation than they do anything with ecology or science.


[Bookmarks on this page: Click any of the following links to go to that bookmark. You can then copy and paste the bookmarks url from your address bar, and send it to someone as a link straight to that bookmark:
Section 1.8 / Comment 75: Claim that mainstream environmentalists advocate getting rid of cars]  

________________

Page 29 of 50

Final Revision

Last updated: 11 Jun 2007