Extracts from Ofcom Complaint, by Category: Misrepresentation of Peoples Views

Extracts from Appendix C: Backgrounds of the Contributors to the Programme

Page 37

_____________________________________________________________________

C.17.2

Links to Corporate-funded Lobby Groups

(For information about the following organisations and the funding they receive, see Appendix D: Corporate-funded Organisations Linked to Contributors to the Programme).

1.

He is a Member of the Science and Economic Advisory Council of The Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy (see http://tinyurl.com/26rdf5).

2.

He is a Contributing Expert to the Cato Institute , and has also written reports for them. See, for example, Lindzen, R., 1992, Global warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus, Regulation Magazine, Vol.15, No. 2, Spring 1992: published by the Cato Institute, http://tinyurl.com/y9gk3j.

3.

He is a Contributing Expert to the George C. Marshall Institute (see http://tinyurl.com/2sq4pf).

4.

He has been a contributor to TCS Daily, the web-based magazine of the Tech Central Science Foundation (see http://tinyurl.com/2lbqad).

5.

He is a global warming expert with the Heartland Institute (see: http://tinyurl.com/33txc4).

C.18

Professor Paul Reiter

Reiter is director of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris. He is a distinguished entomologist specialising in mosquitoes, but although he talked about climate change in the programme, he is not an expert on climate; nor is he an expert on the effects of large-scale environmental change on human health, which he also discussed. Reiters primary area of expertise is the mosquitoes that carry diseases other than malaria, such as those that carry the West Nile Fever virus: not malaria, nor malaria-carrying mosquitoes: yet the narrator of the film referred to him as one of the worlds leading experts on malaria and other insect-borne diseases (see Comment 110, page 16). In addition, his links with the IPCC were greatly overstated by the programme (see Comment 115, page 22).

Thus his credentials with respect to the specific subjects that he discussed in the film were greatly inflated by the film maker, and the public was seriously, and apparently intentionally misled about his expertise in these areas.

It should also have been pointed out that Reiters views on the relationship between climate and infectious disease are certainly not shared by all or even by most scientists working in this area. Here are some examples:

Tanser et al, 2003, http://tinyurl.com/yvqnxb, reports that projected scenarios would estimate a 5–7% potential increase (mainly altitudinal) in malaria distribution with surprisingly little increase in the latitudinal extents of the disease by 2100. In comparison, Reiter focuses on the much more ambitious task of predicting disease.

Continued …


[Bookmarks on this page: Click any of the following links to go to that bookmark. You can then copy and paste the bookmarks url from your address bar, and send it to someone as a link straight to that bookmark:
Appendix C.17.2 / Appendix C.18]  

________________

Page 37 of 50

Final Revision

Last updated: 11 Jun 2007